Ferguson Presentations

After listening to an overwhelming amount of presentations taking us through the whole State of Missouri V Darren Wilson questioning, it is easy to say that the jury got it wrong. Since the witness testimonies were so different, it is hard to know exactly what happened between Michael Brown and Darren Wilson that day. However, their were enough testimonies and questionable actions to at least qualify a trial against Darren Wilson. Did he have his hands up or did he have his hands down? Was he charging officer Wilson like a football player or was he limping towards him? Was the Monte Carlo blue or was it white? There were too many unanswered questions that the jury seemed to disregard with ease. Looking into my case for example, there were huge questionable actions done by the Crime Scene Detective. When examining Darren Wilson's weapon, he had the choice between checking the weapon for fingerprints or swabbing it for DNA. He chose to swab for DNA, now eliminating the option of fingerprinting which could answer the question "did Michael Brown ever touch Darren Wilson's weapon?" With so many, for lack of better words, weird things coming to light there needs to be a trial.