After hearing almost all of the witness testimonies, I'm still having trouble understanding why the grand jury wouldn't want Darren Wilson to go on trial for the death of Michael Brown. A lot of the witness testimonies varied, it was very difficult to figure out what really happened. However, if the true story of what happened was still in question than I don't think Darren Wilson would have been able to walk away. He should have been put on trial so, hopefully, the truth about what happened could be revealed and justice could be served. But since they decided that he was not guilty of anything, it was assumed that he was innocent. I understand that everyone is "innocent until proven guilty", however based on a majority of the witness testimonies Darren Wilson did not seem innocent at all. If there was even the slightest chance that he did it, I think that the jury should have voted to put him on trial so there could be justice for Michael Brown.