Friday, November 4, 2016

The Juice

In the OJ case I believe that OJ was guilty, because to me the glove looked like it would have fit, but he was ripping it and forcing his hand to ruin the glove because no one watched him. I also think, if Vannatter and Fung had done their job’s correctly they could have convicted him, if the data aligned correctly. One thing that I would assume was that if the prosecutors had used different evidence, they could have convicted OJ instead of digging themselves deeper, thanks to Fuhrman's credibility. If they used the shoe theory that was used in the Civil case I believe that he would have been convicted almost immediately. The fact that he lied in court would be one red flag to go off, and then the finding of 30+ pictures in posted newspaper article showing him wearing the shoes would be enough to help prove him guilty. Another thing the prosecution could have considered was that the reading of the DNA was not well thought out, because most of the Jury didn't have an education, therefore they did not understand it and threw it out of their decisions factors.

2 comments:

  1. I think it was pretty obvious he was guilty after the pictures of him with the shoes came out, but still find it shocking how the jury didn't find him guilty of the murder with so many pieces of evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe that OJ was guilty too.I feel if it took place in another area not were he made history or where the Rodney King trail happen.If the cops took this case and progress more carefully they would of got him.

    ReplyDelete